Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

Fuel planning on an multiple stop trip WITHIN one tank filling


Author
Message
flyinghuebi
f
Too Much Forum (52 reputation)Too Much Forum (52 reputation)Too Much Forum (52 reputation)Too Much Forum (52 reputation)Too Much Forum (52 reputation)Too Much Forum (52 reputation)Too Much Forum (52 reputation)Too Much Forum (52 reputation)Too Much Forum (52 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5, Visits: 9
Hi out there. I read a lot in this forum about fuel planning in SD. Even the pros and cons of making a whole new fuel calculation each stop I plan (with the "land here" function) vs. calculating with the remaining fuel.

BTW, I also plead for a fuel calculation possibility for the whole trip. With calclulate on base of remaining fuel (if you need more votes for that Wink)!

But I found so far no answer for a mostly common problem we have (expect of "do it manually"):

- I recently plan a trip of about 2 hours flight time. That is absolutely within my tank capacity WHITOUT any refuelling including reserves.
- The trip has four stops (or more. But even with one stop the problem exists)
- At each leg I get a fuel calculation by SD including the 30 min. holding.
This makes about 120 minutes of holdings/reserve on a 120 minute flight with 4 stops. That does really not make sense!

Altough I do understand why you (until now Wink) decided not to implement a feature that calculates the fuel based on the remaining amout after first landing, I cannot find a way to tell SD "please use the 30 Min. Holding and contingency JUST ONCE".

Is there a way to do so which I simply not found?

It is absolutely clear that I can plan a flight without "land here" and ad manually the amount of fuel for landing and departure/take off. But that is IMHO much more critical and error-prone, than computing with the reamining fuel I think. 

A suggestion for that often discussed topic could be: In the settings offer a checkbox which says "Plan or do not plan reserve/holding/contingency after each landing". If you want add "we highly recommend to leave this active". Or an explanation "If you turn this to off reserve/holding/contingency fuel will be calculates just once for the whole trip".

But the - in my opinion -  best solution is the here in the forum often suggested way to calculate a multiple stop (or sector) with the remaining fuel and send a warning when there is not enough fuel for further legs.

Thank for your suggestions on my question above, hints and answers

Daniel




---------------------------------------------------------------
"If you know where you are you can be wherever you want..."

Reply
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K, Visits: 9.7K
The reason why we (so far) haven't implemented anything like this is the complexity we think it could add to the product. Although we do support dividing a long trip into multiple sectors, we don't really do anything at the moment to link the sectors together. Instead they are all essentially different flights, with their own self-contained planning.

If I understand you correctly you'd benefit from some kind of user interface that would make it easier to decide when to "flow" the remaining fuel through to the next sector, with the assumption of course that you didn't use any contingency or holding fuel.

GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search